The calculus of power

Posted by Marc Hodak on April 9, 2008 under Politics | Comments are off for this article

I’m always amazed by the naivete of people willing to concentrate more power into the hands of politicians for “altruistic” reasons. This is always coupled with the expectation that the “right person” will wield that power in the “right way.”

But look at the evidence. Politicians use their power for reasons they and their supporters believe in, and sometimes for parochial, petty, and sometimes nefarious reasons. But they almost always exercise their power in such a way as to keep it, or get more. Power is a kind of currency that is rarely wasted or left unspent.

So, if a political leader’s choice were to (a) give up power versus (b) keep it, even after 28 years of rule, even if keeping it caused widespread pain, suffering or bloodshed, what do you think the choice would be?

The politics of meaning

Posted by Marc Hodak on April 8, 2008 under Politics | 2 Comments to Read

Politics is about finding meaning. That’s probably why I have such a difficult time with politics. For instance, I have no idea what this means (from an AP story about Hillary’s reaction to a McCain comment):

“I fundamentally disagree,” Clinton said, reading from prepared remarks that aides said she wrote.

Does this mean that Clinton disagreed? Or that she read her disagreement from prepared remarks? Or that she wrote those remarks herself? Or that aides said she wrote them?

I’m assuming there are actually editors working at the AP. If this is edited copy, one must assume there is something more to this statement beyond the nominal quote. Someone, please help me out, here.