An economist summarizes the health care debate

Posted by Marc Hodak on July 3, 2009 under Economics, Invisible trade-offs | 2 Comments to Read

And does a great job of it.  He leads with a great punch:

“The American people overwhelmingly favor reform.”

If you ask whether people would be happier if somebody else paid their medical bills, they generally say yes. But surveys on consumers’ satisfaction with their quality of care show overwhelming support for the continuation of the present arrangement. The best proof of this is the belated recognition by the proponents of health-care reform that they need to promise people that they can keep what they have now.

My own summary:  I’m amazed at the number of otherwise intelligent people who favor reform on the theory that we can’t individually afford the skyrocketing costs of health care, but that we can afford it collectively, and that by increasing the degree to which I’m paying for your health care and you’re paying for mine, we’ll bring those overall costs under control.

  • Kat said,

    They’ll argue that you remove the adverse selection issue and get economies of scale. Total bullshit because any gains from those things will be outweighed by the costs associated with the propensity to overuse the system, government waste and fraud and the fact that keeping old, sick and fat people alive ain’t cheap.

  • Donnieboy said,

    Just wanted to drop you a line to say, I enjoy reading your site. I thought about starting a blog myself but don’t have the time.
    Oh well maybe one day…. 🙂

Add A Comment