The easiest method of accounting for taxes would be to simply assign a
single tax rate on net operating profits (i.e., NOP or adjusted Income
before taxes) and subtract deferred tax assets from net assets. The
obvious drawback to such simplicity is the loss of all tax sensitive
information associated with the business's activities and the
associated loss of incentive to manage taxes at all. (Reporting results
on a pre-tax basis is just a special version of this flat tax treatment,
i.e., a flat tax of zero.) However, a great benefit of consolidated
financial statements is that cash taxes paid can be easily tracked. The
cash taxes thus derived can be compared to a "flat tax"
applied to NOP, with the difference tracked as a net deferred tax asset
or liability. This deferred tax amount can then be treated in either of
the above Options 1 or 2.
This treatment is a cleaner, simpler
version of the prior options. Instead of working from the tax provision,
management applies a standard tax rate to their income, either at the
business or project level, and separately accounts for their potential
cash consequences. Any analysis based on these results will account for
all relevant tax information, i.e., taxes paid and taxes deferred. It is
always true that the tax based on the flat rate plus the difference
between that amount and the cash tax will always equal the cash tax,
regardless of what "flat" tax rate is chosen.
Tax
provision
Flat tax
+ Change in net deferred taxes
+ (Cash taxes - Flat tax)
Cash taxes
Cash taxes
Choosing a flat tax rate that approximates
the long-run effective rate of the company (either in terms of accrued
or cash taxes) improves matching of income and taxes and simplifies
tracking and project analysis.
The drawback to this treatment is that the
difference between the chosen flat tax and actual cash taxes will need
to be tracked. This will require a schedule of the differences to be
established and maintained by financial management, with the results
communicated to operating management on a regular basis.
Business Unit Alternatives
Business units rarely have a choice with regards to accrued or cash taxes. Even if taxes are reported for the
unit, they generally include allocations that are insensitive to any of
the business's activities. Even if the business is a tax entity for
reporting purposes, its bottom-line results may be heavily affected by
transfer prices specifically designed to either minimize the unit's
taxable income or minimize the taxable income of a sister unit. Neither
of these outcomes is likely to reflect the economic condition of the
business unit on its own. Therefore, business units below consolidated
require a tax rate that must either be derived from that of the
corporate entity or created from the business unit's own identifiable
results.