GAAP Treatment
The cost of
materials and other inputs of the production process are capitalized
into inventory at the time of purchase or manufacture. At the time a
product using those materials is sold, the inventory is written down by
the cost of goods sold (COGS) and the expense is recognized in income.
In theory,
inventory costs should include all charges incurred in the purchase and
manufacture of a good, including cost of materials, logistics, direct
and indirect labor, and various indirect (i.e., allocated) manufacturing
costs such as supplies, depreciation, and utilities.
As a practical matter, many indirect costs are difficult to trace to particular goods
and, therefore, are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Furthermore,
specific costs may vary for like goods or may be difficult to trace to
specific sales. Therefore, assumptions are generally made about inventory costs at the time of
sale. The most common assumption is that the last item purchased is the
first item sold, i.e., last-in-first-out (LIFO). An alternative
assumption is that the first items purchased are the first sold, or
first-in-first-out (FIFO).
Tax laws require that the inventory costing method selected for tax reporting must be the
same used for financial reporting. In times of rising
prices LIFO makes COGS look more expensive, which reduces profits and,
therefore, reduces taxes. In most companies that use LIFO, the
difference between FIFO and LIFO is tracked in an off-balance sheet
reserve.
Economics of Product Costing
The real value of
inventory changes all the time after goods are purchased and as they are
converted through manufacture. Changes in value are eventually realized
at the time of sale if one is using the FIFO inventory costing method.
Using anything other than FIFO will always leave a residual unrecognized
gain that, in times of rising prices, will grow indefinitely.
Although tax laws
require consistency between tax and financial reporting, they do not
require consistency between tax or financial reports and managerial
reports. Thus, for managerial reporting purposes, management is
permitted as well as justified in using the FIFO method for costing
inventory.
At a point in time when a decision is required, it is important to consider only
the opportunity costs associated with that decision. Many (finished
goods) inventory costs do not include difficult-to-allocate indirect
costs. Interestingly, accountants consider this lack of allocation to be
a shortcoming in the costing of goods from purchase to sale. In reality,
failure to allocate costs is often a virtue for decision making, as most
indirect costs are fixed relative to post-production decisions. Indeed,
when indirect costs are bundled into the costs of finished goods, they
can distort the economics of
post-production decisions.
Behavioral Impact
Managers who use
LIFO for decision making see a consistent understatement of the
profitability of the firm and the amount of capital upon which they must
earn a return. Depending on the inflationary environment, management may
be faced with a reduced incentive to invest because of artificially low
returns.
Even in an environment of low inflation, the LIFO reserve continues to grow,
reflecting a cumulative unrealized gain for the company that will
normally go unrecognized (unless the company liquidates). LIFO results
in substandard matching of costs and revenues.
Alternative Treatments
Change from LIFO to FIFO
The LIFO reserve
can be added to inventory to reflect inventory in FIFO terms. The change
in LIFO reserve can be added back to income to reflect in NOPAT the FIFO
cost of goods sold, which provides superior matching of revenues and
costs.
Obviously, this
adjustment can only be made where the LIFO reserve is calculated, which
is usually at the corporate level. The company may track it at the
business unit level as well.
In times of
steady, low inflation, this adjustment obviously has only a minor impact
on the change in EP from one period to the next.
Unbundling fixed costs
An unrelated
adjustment with regards to inventory costing is to segregate out
indirect costs that cannot be objectively identified with specific
products being sold. Cost allocations would
be thus appropriately undone.
The virtues of including only variable costs in COGS is that it forces management to
account for fixed costs when the decision to incur those costs are being
made (usually at capital budgeting time) while treating those fixed
costs as sunk when post-production decisions are being made (i.e., when
selling). This encourages economic behavior on both kinds of decisions.
This unbundling of costs may be physically difficult given system constraints
on accounting and reporting software. It may also be psychologically
difficult for cost accountants who insist on all "product
profits" adding up, and on operating managers who feel that
allocated costs provide a control on the price cutting instincts of
salespeople. Neither of these considerations should remain once everyone
is focused on EVA improvement. |