{"id":3319,"date":"2014-02-25T10:04:19","date_gmt":"2014-02-25T18:04:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/?p=3319"},"modified":"2014-03-03T10:05:21","modified_gmt":"2014-03-03T18:05:21","slug":"bonuses-economic-logic-leads-to-a-paradox","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/bonuses-economic-logic-leads-to-a-paradox\/","title":{"rendered":"Bonuses:  Economic logic leads to a &#8220;paradox&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" title=\"Waterfall\" src=\"http:\/\/ayay.co.uk\/arts\/optical_illusion\/m_c_escher\/waterfall-detail.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"336\" height=\"332\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Paradox:<em> a statement that is seemingly contradictory or opposed to common sense and yet is perhaps true<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The media in Europe are starting to call skyrocketing banker salaries across Europe the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/intl\/cms\/s\/0\/bcfe2c04-9d78-11e3-a599-00144feab7de.html#slide0\">bonus paradox<\/a><em>.<\/em>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The EU limit on bonuses to 100 percent of salary (or 200% with shareholder approval) is ushering a paradoxical parade of unintended consequences.\u00a0 But just because consequences are unintended <a href=\"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/?p=3023\">doesn&#8217;t mean they are unpredictable<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.co.uk\/2013\/03\/21\/socialist-meps-claim-victory_n_2922234.html\">economic ignoranti<\/a> fully expected overall banker pay to be clipped by the EU measure.\u00a0 Jos\u00e9 Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission said, \u201cThis is a  question of fairness.&#8221;\u00a0 So, there it is.<\/p>\n<p>Except that banks are not going to lose their most mobile workers for insufficient pay.\u00a0 Bankers, you may not be surprised, are good with money; they know what they are worth, and they are confident about it.\u00a0 They would actually prefer to be paid for performance, and are unhappy about the higher mix of fixed-to-variable compensation that effectively caps their upside, even if it leaves them more-or-less whole in expected value terms.\u00a0 But they will not accept less than what the guy down the street, or in New York or Hong Kong, will pay them.<\/p>\n<p>The more sophisticated proponents of this law would say that it wasn&#8217;t the level of pay they were actually after, but the structure of pay in the form of bonuses that encouraged undue risk taking.\u00a0 They&#8217;re OK with the new compensation mix, and feel it will reduce financial risk.\u00a0 They are wrong, too.\u00a0 Yes, it is theoretically possible that perverse incentives can lead to undue risk-taking, and there was certainly some of that going on in the lead-up to the financial crisis.\u00a0 But there is zero evidence that bonus structures that have been around for decades, and whose incentive effect have been understood and refined and overseen for decades, would all of a sudden in the middle of the aughts suddenly be the cause of a global catastrophe.\u00a0 If you want to properly diagnose a cause, look at what has changed, not at what was always there.\u00a0 If that logic doesn&#8217;t persuade, then perhaps empirical evidence would, and the evidence <a href=\"http:\/\/ideas.repec.org\/a\/eee\/jfinec\/v99y2011i1p11-26.html\">denies the hypothesis<\/a>.\u00a0 If logic and empiricism don&#8217;t sway you&#8230;then you are fully qualified to run for the legislature.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately we are not done with paradoxes and unintended consequences.<!--more--> The whole point of this law, along with its companion rule on capital buffers, was to reduce financial risk faced by banks.\u00a0 Yes, financial risk may be reduced by capital buffers.\u00a0 But it is heightened by fixed costs.\u00a0 This law replaced a large portion of variable costs with fixed costs, more than negating the effect of capital buffers.\u00a0 When the downturn comes as it inevitably must no matter what the capital buffers, banks will have less flexibility to deal with it.<\/p>\n<p>Paradoxical?\u00a0 Sure.\u00a0 Unintended?\u00a0 Certainly.<\/p>\n<p>But totally predictable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Paradox: a statement that is seemingly contradictory or opposed to common sense and yet is perhaps true The media in Europe are starting to call skyrocketing banker salaries across Europe the &#8220;bonus paradox.&#8221; The EU limit on bonuses to 100 percent of salary (or 200% with shareholder approval) is ushering a paradoxical parade of unintended [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-executive-compensation","category-stupid-laws"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3319"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3319\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3322,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3319\/revisions\/3322"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}