{"id":308,"date":"2008-09-11T02:30:40","date_gmt":"2008-09-11T10:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/?p=308"},"modified":"2008-09-11T02:30:40","modified_gmt":"2008-09-11T10:30:40","slug":"does-obama-understand-women","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/does-obama-understand-women\/","title":{"rendered":"Does Obama understand women?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I don&#8217;t know if Obama intended to call <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/video\/playerIndex?id=5772747\">Sarah Palin a pig<\/a>.  I really don&#8217;t.  But it can certainly be interpreted that way.  Sure, the phrase &#8220;lipstick on a pig&#8221; is commonly used in Washington.  Sure, McCain himself has even used it referring to Hillary&#8217;s health care proposal in 2007.  But Hillary didn&#8217;t brand herself as the lipstick lady in 2007.  Palin did two weeks ago.  Everybody knows it.  The media burned it into our consciousness.  Before Nike, a teammate saying &#8220;Just do it,&#8221; was being supportive.  After their ad campaign, he was being cliche.  Same words, different time.  That&#8217;s how marketing works.  Obama knows this as well as anyone.<\/p>\n<p>So Obama can complain all he wants about being unfairly tagged with a slur.  Here&#8217;s what he&#8217;s pretending not to get.  Let&#8217;s say Barack and Michele are drying dishes in the kitchen and he says something and Michele gets a look on her face.  Barack doesn&#8217;t know where the look came from, but it&#8217;s not pretty.  Barack says, &#8220;What&#8217;s wrong honey?&#8221;  Michele says, &#8220;Did you just say I was a&#8230;&#8221;  Doesn&#8217;t matter what she thought she heard.  Doesn&#8217;t matter if he meant it.  When it comes down to it, it doesn&#8217;t even matter if he really said it.  All that matters is that she heard it.  If you&#8217;re a guy, you&#8217;ve been there.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nYou know that this is not a moment to quibble, unless you sleep just fine on the old couch.  You can go in with, &#8220;if you look at the context in which I used that phrase, you&#8217;ll see that what you think is not what I meant.&#8221;  Doesn&#8217;t do you any good.  If she has that I-don&#8217;t-believe-you-even-said-that look on her face, you simply apologize.  Right then.  Right there.<\/p>\n<p>Right now, millions of women have that look on their face.  They heard &#8220;lipstick on a pig&#8221; and, right or wrong, they heard Obama call Palin a pig.  That&#8217;s how I heard it the first time I saw him say it.  Barack explains, &#8220;If you look at the context in which I used that phrase&#8230;&#8221;  OK, fine.  I&#8217;ll buy it.  But my perspective is worth nothing.  I&#8217;m a guy.  Every day Obama defends it, women on the fence are falling away from him.  His minions can shout all they want about how he&#8217;s right, and the Republicans are making this up, or overreacting, or not able to take what they dish out.  Whatever.  Obama is pretending he doesn&#8217;t get it.<\/p>\n<p>I say pretending because I think Obama is a smart guy, and he&#8217;s been in relationships a long time.  He knows this stuff.  There must be something&#8211;a righteous streak, a deluded sense of fairness, or maybe just fatigue&#8211;overpowering this knowledge and pushing it aside.  It&#8217;s kind of a shame really.  But McCain didn&#8217;t make him cross the lipstick line.  Obama did it himself.  How quickly can he jump back over it?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I don&#8217;t know if Obama intended to call Sarah Palin a pig. I really don&#8217;t. But it can certainly be interpreted that way. Sure, the phrase &#8220;lipstick on a pig&#8221; is commonly used in Washington. Sure, McCain himself has even used it referring to Hillary&#8217;s health care proposal in 2007. But Hillary didn&#8217;t brand herself [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-308","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-invisible-trade-offs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=308"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}