{"id":2974,"date":"2013-06-20T09:47:42","date_gmt":"2013-06-20T17:47:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/?p=2974"},"modified":"2013-06-23T13:31:49","modified_gmt":"2013-06-23T21:31:49","slug":"is-shareholder-value-maximization-a-myth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/is-shareholder-value-maximization-a-myth\/","title":{"rendered":"The Myth of the &#8220;Shareholder Value Myth&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Lynn Stout published the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/The-Shareholder-Value-Myth-ebook\/dp\/B007PIZ8IO\">The Shareholder Value Myth<\/a> late last year, and it has created some stir.\u00a0 In the book, she blames meltdowns like Enron and disasters like BP&#8217;s Macondo on &#8220;shareholder value thinking,&#8221; and suggests that managers and directors loosen up on this obsession.\u00a0  I&#8217;m always surprised when people use Enron and BP&#8211;companies that  miserably failed their shareholders&#8211;as examples of shareholder value thinking run amok.\u00a0 But Stout is a respected legal scholar, and her arguments deserve a more thorough appraisal.<\/p>\n<div id=\"dsq-comment-text-544948816\" class=\"dsq-comment-text\">\n<p>Stout&#8217;s disparagement of &#8220;shareholder value&#8221; begins with the disconnect between a corporate board&#8217;s legal requirement versus its economic imperative.\u00a0 Contrary to popular belief, boards have no legal obligation to maximize shareholder value.\u00a0 The evolution of fiduciary duties plus the business judgment rule sets the legal bar far below &#8220;maximization,&#8221; which leaves directors plenty of leeway to take risks without fear of being dragged into court every time an investment fails.\u00a0 Stout believes, and I agree, that this legal order has served shareholders and our overall economy very well.\u00a0 But the reason this low legal bar works is because the board&#8217;s economic imperative is far less forgiving.<\/p>\n<p>If you aren&#8217;t aiming to maximize returns to your shareholders, then you&#8217;re doing something else.\u00a0 There is nothing wrong with pursuing other social goals that coincide with shareholder value, but if your &#8220;success&#8221; comes <em>at the expense<\/em> of your shareholders, you will lose them.\u00a0 The competition for capital is fierce.\u00a0 It crosses industry lines and national borders.\u00a0 It never ebbs or wanes.\u00a0 There is little room for slacking off in the pursuit of shareholder value.<\/p>\n<p>Stout does not so much disagree with this characterization of the shareholder value imperative as she defines it away.\u00a0 She asserts that &#8220;shareholder value thinking&#8221; leads to short-term behaviors and illusory results that don&#8217;t actually lead to long-term value creation.\u00a0 But what Stout is describing is not a goal problem; it&#8217;s a knowledge problem.\u00a0 The market cannot distinguish what managers <em>claim<\/em> to be a focus on shareholder value versus the reality of their behavior.\u00a0 If it could make that distinction, it would immediately discount sub-optimal decisions and actions into the stock price.\u00a0 In other words, Stout rejects management claims that their behavior actually enhances shareholder value, yet accepts their labeling of their bad behavior as &#8220;shareholder value thinking.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->She next attacks the practical underpinnings of &#8220;shareholder value&#8221; with the question &#8220;which shareholders?&#8221;\u00a0 She is not the first to suggest that &#8220;the shareholder&#8221; is an academic construct with no referent in reality, but this misses an important part of reality.\u00a0 So what if some of your hedge fund investors don&#8217;t really care about long-term value creation?\u00a0 So what if your &#8220;social responsibility&#8221; investors may not care about shareholder value at all?\u00a0 If you can&#8217;t produce returns to your investors over time, you can&#8217;t compete for capital, and your firm will die.\u00a0 However ephemeral &#8220;the shareholders&#8221; may seem as a theoretical construct, the life and death of companies based on their ability to generate returns to them is concrete.<\/p>\n<p>Stout&#8217;s main evidence of the damage wrought by the pursuit of &#8220;shareholder value&#8221; is the decline of the public corporation during the last 20 years, when she claims the shareholder value mantra gained ascendancy.\u00a0 In other words, in a period when more companies seemed to embrace shareholder value, shareholder value has actually stalled, and the number of public companies has precipitously declined, down by 40 percent since their peak in the late 1990s.<\/p>\n<p>We can acknowledge the dysfunctional behaviors Stout cites as among the reasons for this decline, and still see this as an example of correlation without causation.\u00a0 Many other things have happened in the last 20 years that provide a more compelling explanation for the decline of public companies.\u00a0 For instance, the short-termism that Stout bemoans is the direct consequence of new disclosure rules that have severely constrained the ability of companies to communicate with their investors, putting an artificially high market focus on earnings announcements.\u00a0 More generally, corporate regulations have grown like well-fertilized weeds, making it much more costly to become and to remain a public company.\u00a0 However, at the same time that the &#8220;shareholder value&#8221; mantra was gaining popularity among the declining number of public companies, it has thoroughly dominated thinking in large private companies, whose number has grown five-fold over the same period, and whose market value has grown even more.<\/p>\n<p>Language has consequences.\u00a0 Stout&#8217;s condemnation of &#8220;shareholder value&#8221; plays into a larger stigmatization of the idea from anti-corporate critics (of which Stout is not).\u00a0 The main effect of that stigmatization is likely to be managers edging away from that ideal.\u00a0 In my experience, encouraging managers to ignore shareholder value unmoors them from the only governing objective that makes sense for a for-profit firm.\u00a0 In its stead, they substitute fuzzy  notions of multiple objectives or stakeholder goals, which effectively means substituting their personal, subjective ideas about what the firm should be doing in lieu of a  single-minded concern about what residual claimants will need  to see in return for their continued support.\u00a0 The fact that we can&#8217;t  perfectly see or quantify shareholder expectations, or perfectly  understand how our actions today will translate into returns that they  will appreciate, is no excuse for throwing up our hands, and saying we  should just do what feels right, regardless of how it will show up to  our shareholders in the one number that will, in fact, actually matter  to them.<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lynn Stout published the The Shareholder Value Myth late last year, and it has created some stir.\u00a0 In the book, she blames meltdowns like Enron and disasters like BP&#8217;s Macondo on &#8220;shareholder value thinking,&#8221; and suggests that managers and directors loosen up on this obsession.\u00a0 I&#8217;m always surprised when people use Enron and BP&#8211;companies that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2974","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-governance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2974","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2974"}],"version-history":[{"count":44,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2974\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3101,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2974\/revisions\/3101"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2974"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2974"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2974"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}