{"id":2762,"date":"2010-11-18T08:21:43","date_gmt":"2010-11-18T16:21:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/?p=2762"},"modified":"2010-11-18T08:27:13","modified_gmt":"2010-11-18T16:27:13","slug":"raising-his-hand-pick-me","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/raising-his-hand-pick-me\/","title":{"rendered":"(Raising his hand) Pick me!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" title=\"TSA Screening\" src=\"http:\/\/jcrue.files.wordpress.com\/2010\/01\/tsa_profiling.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"248\" height=\"240\" \/>As the TSA begins offering U.S. citizens the choice between having their genitalia displayed on a screen or having them groped by an agent, a top <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748703688704575620601511628936.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_lifestyle\">TSA Administrator defends the intrusion<\/a> with this question:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;If you have two planes, one where people are thoroughly and properly  screened and the other where people could opt out of screening, which  would you want to be on?&#8221; he asked.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Frankly, I think the choice above is a tough call because I put so little credence in the efficacy of our full-blown <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/magazine\/archive\/2008\/11\/the-things-he-carried\/7057\/\">security theater<\/a>, but I do appreciate at least some passenger screening.\u00a0 But the question itself is simply a TSA administrator&#8217;s leading question, a form of intellectual coercion, designed to justify the physical abuse.\u00a0 He could have asked his question a million different ways that would better reflect the sensibilities of the citizens whose intelligence he insults:<\/p>\n<p>1)\u00a0 <em>&#8220;If you have two planes, one where people are <\/em><em>thoroughly and properly  screened*<\/em><em>, and the other where they they are screened marginally better than they were in the 1990s, <\/em><em>which  would you want to go on?<\/em><em>&#8220;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>2)\u00a0 &#8220;If you have two planes, one where people are <\/em><em>thoroughly and properly  screened*<\/em><em>, and the other where they just had random bag searches and well-trained agents ready to ask additional questions, <\/em><em>which  would you want to go on?<\/em><em>&#8221;<br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>3) <\/em><em>&#8220;If you have two planes, one where <\/em><em>people are <\/em><em>thoroughly and properly  screened*<\/em><em>, and the other where certain  fliers were non-randomly selected for screening,  which  would you want to be on?&#8221; he asked.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I know the last alternative is an invitation to racial profiling, but as someone with somewhat Moroccan features, I might still choose an airport security system where I&#8217;m slightly delayed going through it, but I&#8217;m unlikely to be delayed behind Pa Kettle, Grandma Myrtle, and little Bobby and Susie, waiting their turn to be searched for shoe bombs and box cutters.<\/p>\n<p>And if the government really had any conviction around that administrator&#8217;s question, it would allow the airlines to give their passengers a choice among screening regimes, including opting out, to test the regulators assumption that people would tolerate any intrusion in the name of safety.<\/p>\n<p><em>* <\/em><em>I.e., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tsa.gov\/travelers\/airtravel\/screening\/index.shtm\">told to remove their shoes, separate their laptops from their other baggage, present their liquids  in plastic bags of an approved size, and parade before a denuding  apparatus&#8230;<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tsa.gov\/travelers\/airtravel\/screening\/index.shtm\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As the TSA begins offering U.S. citizens the choice between having their genitalia displayed on a screen or having them groped by an agent, a top TSA Administrator defends the intrusion with this question: &#8220;If you have two planes, one where people are thoroughly and properly screened and the other where people could opt out [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[72,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-government-service","category-invisible-trade-offs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2762"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2762\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2766,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2762\/revisions\/2766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}