{"id":2703,"date":"2010-08-18T16:20:11","date_gmt":"2010-08-19T00:20:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/?p=2703"},"modified":"2010-08-18T16:20:11","modified_gmt":"2010-08-19T00:20:11","slug":"research-on-employee-rankings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/research-on-employee-rankings\/","title":{"rendered":"Research on employee rankings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Theory<\/strong>:\u00a0 Ranking employees, and letting them know where they rank, inspires a competition to improve one&#8217;s performance, or to continue to excel.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Experimental result:<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu\/article.cfm?articleid=2567\">Not<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>[Professor] Barankay [of Wharton] randomly divided workers into two groups &#8212; a control group  receiving no ranking and a treatment group receiving feedback with a  ranking. He then sent an e-mail to all of the workers inviting them to  return to do more assignments. The content of all the e-mails was the  same, except that individuals in the treatment group found out how they  ranked in terms of their answers&#8217; accuracy. The aim was to determine  whether giving people feedback affected their desire to do more work, as  well as the quantity and quality of their work.  Of the workers in the control group, 66% came back for more work,  compared with 42% in the treatment group. The members of the treatment  group who returned were also 22% less productive than the control group.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Prof. Barankay also offered workers either a job where they would be ranked or one where they wouldn&#8217;t be.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>[T]he job without the feedback attracted more workers &#8212; 254, compared with 76 for the job with feedback. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;This was a surprising outcome, but it speaks to the paradigm of  revealed preferences,&#8221; he notes. &#8220;Economists are usually very skeptical  about what people say they will do. We focus on what people actually  choose to do. Their choices convey information about what they care  about. In this case, it seems that people would rather not know how they  rank compared to others, even though when we surveyed these workers  after the experiment, 74% said they wanted feedback about their rank.&#8221;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So, people generally don&#8217;t like to be ranked against their peers, even though they say they do, and rankings appear to encourage the high performers to slack off and the poor performers to give up.\u00a0 Contrary to theory, it also encourages high performers to leave and poor performers to stay.\u00a0 High performers are given the confidence to go out and find new challenges, while poor performers appear to get demoralized, and may have fewer options besides.<\/p>\n<p>This research stands in contrast to research on tournaments, which appear to motivate more productive behavior.\u00a0 Thus, the research indicates that it depends on how the feedback and reward mechanisms interact.\u00a0 Competition can breed excellence, and competition includes comparisons and consequences.\u00a0 But comparison alone can breed complacency or demoralization.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Theory:\u00a0 Ranking employees, and letting them know where they rank, inspires a competition to improve one&#8217;s performance, or to continue to excel. Experimental result: Not [Professor] Barankay [of Wharton] randomly divided workers into two groups &#8212; a control group receiving no ranking and a treatment group receiving feedback with a ranking. He then sent an [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,9],"tags":[79],"class_list":["post-2703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-revealed-preference","category-unintended-consequences","tag-science-of-hr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2703"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2703\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2704,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2703\/revisions\/2704"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}