{"id":1767,"date":"2009-08-17T05:33:59","date_gmt":"2009-08-17T13:33:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/?p=1767"},"modified":"2009-08-17T05:37:00","modified_gmt":"2009-08-17T13:37:00","slug":"regulate-this","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/regulate-this\/","title":{"rendered":"Regulate this"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Board capture Exhibit A:\u00a0 Larry Ellison<\/p>\n<p>Ellison routinely gets Wall Street sized bonuses for running a software firm of which he owns about 23%.\u00a0 He is awarded millions of stock options each year, including 7 million new options in each of the last two years.\u00a0 In 2007, that award alone was worth over $50 million.\u00a0 Last year, the award was worth $71 million.\u00a0 Now, a board with some say over compensation would ask two questions:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; If we didn&#8217;t give Larry 7 million options, would we be risking him leaving?\u00a0 We probably shouldn&#8217;t be too concerned about Larry being snatched up by Microsoft or Sun, but would he even offer the credible threat of retiring?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; If we didn&#8217;t give Larry these 7 million options, would the shareholders suffer in some way from lack of alignment of his interests with theirs?\u00a0 In other words, what alignment would 0.007 billion shares add to the other 1.173 billion shares that Larry already owns?<\/p>\n<p>The most likely answer is that this board does not really have that much say over Larry Ellison&#8217;s compensation.<\/p>\n<p>This would fit neatly into the widely accepted theory that boards in general are captured by their CEOs, willing to ignore shareholder concerns in favor of keeping the big guy (or gal, but usually guy) happy.\u00a0 This theory or managerial power behind the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2009\/02\/13\/AR2009021303288.html\">topsy<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.govtrack.us\/congress\/bill.xpd?bill=h111-851\">of<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.truthout.org\/081309F\">regulations<\/a> being proposed this year.<\/p>\n<p>But is Ellison the rule or the exception?\u00a0 Research suggests that <a href=\"http:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=648648\">he is the exception<\/a>.\u00a0 So, if board capture is the exception, do we as shareholders benefit from the new rules?\u00a0 (Answer <a href=\"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/?p=1386\">here<\/a>.)\u00a0 But that is a tired question.<\/p>\n<p>Today, I ask a different question.\u00a0 Would any of the new rules being proposed actually prevent the kind of agency costs\/shareholder pilferage represented by exceptions like Ellison?<\/p>\n<p>It is highly unlikely that the shares being showered on him serve any retention or alignment benefit.\u00a0 But how, exactly, would mandating nominally independent directors help?\u00a0 Oracle already has those.\u00a0 What would shareholders have to say about his pay, especially given that he owns nearly a quarter of those shares?\u00a0 Would they withhold votes for rest of the board if they ignored a non-binding vote against his pay?\u00a0 Would Ellison care?<\/p>\n<p>In fact, all captured boards share certain characteristics.\u00a0 Their CEO has been around a long time&#8211;probably longer than any of them&#8211;so he benefits from multiple sources of authority.\u00a0 The main source of authority is raw success.\u00a0 You may not be surprised how hard it is to argue with extreme success, especially when measured in billions.\u00a0 The captured board&#8217;s CEO is probably a celebrity, and has the kind of PR machine that your average director could merely dream of.\u00a0 You don&#8217;t want to get in a public p*ss*ng match with this guy.<\/p>\n<p>These characteristics of captured boards make it extremely difficult to contain their CEOs.\u00a0 Short of mandatory retirement or terms limits (and imagine enforcing that on an Ellison, or a McNealy, or Hank Greenberg, etc.), there is little one can legislatively do keep such people in check.\u00a0 Michael Eisner only became vulnerable when Disney&#8217;s performance lagged for about a decade, undermining that key source of his authority.<\/p>\n<p>The average CEO who was appointed by the board within the last seven years.\u00a0 His or her track record ranges from OK to pretty good.\u00a0 People like this are already in pretty good check by their boards, and it&#8217;s a good bet that the market is driving their compensation.\u00a0 For those firms&#8211;representing the vast majority of companies&#8211;all the new rules simply add cost and risk to the firm, which I really don&#8217;t appreciate as a shareholder.<\/p>\n<p>So, I&#8217;m waiting to see how the new rules may contain Larry Ellison and his board.\u00a0 I don&#8217;t doubt that Oracle&#8217;s shareholder suffer from overpaying their CEO, but they bought into this leaky bucket up front.\u00a0 Ellison didn&#8217;t just appear one day and take over.\u00a0 The costs of legislative and SEC attempts to keep his compensation in check may result in modest net savings for Oracle&#8217;s shareholders, but they are sure to add significant costs for the vast majority of the public company universe.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Board capture Exhibit A:\u00a0 Larry Ellison Ellison routinely gets Wall Street sized bonuses for running a software firm of which he owns about 23%.\u00a0 He is awarded millions of stock options each year, including 7 million new options in each of the last two years.\u00a0 In 2007, that award alone was worth over $50 million.\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1767","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-executive-compensation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1767","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1767"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1767\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1770,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1767\/revisions\/1770"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1767"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1767"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1767"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}