{"id":128,"date":"2007-10-04T08:39:34","date_gmt":"2007-10-04T16:39:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/?p=128"},"modified":"2007-10-04T08:39:34","modified_gmt":"2007-10-04T16:39:34","slug":"flash-markets-arent-perfect","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/flash-markets-arent-perfect\/","title":{"rendered":"Flash:  Markets aren&#8217;t perfect"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A Wharton professor, Joel Waldfogel, has just <a href=\"http:\/\/knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu\/article.cfm?articleid=1816\">published a book<\/a> called &#8220;Tyranny of the Market,&#8221; a play on Mill&#8217;s notion of the tyranny of the majority.  Waldfogel&#8217;s thesis is this:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Everyone think markets provide what everyone wants in the right amounts<br \/>\n&#8211; Everyone thinks that governments are grossly inefficient at providing what people want<br \/>\n&#8211; Markets, in fact, sometime leave minorities behind because their preferences cannot be profitably met for high fixed-cost products or services<br \/>\n&#8211; It may be efficient to not always let the market decide what or how much to produce<\/p>\n<p>I think Waldfogel is making a thoughtful argument, here, but I don&#8217;t like it on several grounds:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Far from everyone, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.insidehighered.com\/news\/2007\/10\/03\/heterodox\">including most economists<\/a>, thinks that markets are all that great, let alone perfect<br \/>\n&#8211; Far from everyone, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tnr.com\/doc.mhtml?i=20070219&#038;s=emanuelfuchs021907\">especially those dealing with voters<\/a>, considers government to be grossly inefficient<br \/>\n&#8211; The idea that high fixed-cost products don&#8217;t permeate as easily into minority populations makes sense in theory, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.magsdirect.com\/black-magazines.html\">but is<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latinorchid.com\/\">vastly<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.billboard.com\/bbcom\/index.jsp\">overstated<\/a><br \/>\n&#8211; Many economics professors, <a href=\"http:\/\/rodrik.typepad.com\/dani_rodriks_weblog\/economists_blindspots\/index.html\">including those with a high profile<\/a>, continuously and exhaustively make the claim that market inefficiency provides some rationale for government intervention<\/p>\n<p>Although a lot of good stuff has been written about that last point, none of those writings, including Waldfogel&#8217;s, provides a decent explanation, or even convincing examples in the real world, of how government imperfections can be sufficiently overcome to make their remedy of market imperfections an efficient solution.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, history speaks with one voice when it comes to comparing government remedies for market imperfections versus market evolution around those imperfections.  Government interventions, even if they seem to work for a little while, almost invariably become a story of waste, fraud, or astronomical costs&#8211;and often all three.  Most things that people historically said the market couldn&#8217;t do have been done, including private mail, private toll roads, an explosion of products and services accessible to minorities of all types, even the poor (still not &#8220;perfect,&#8221; but a generation ago non-existent, like cell phones and mortgages).<\/p>\n<p>In fact, government intervention is a powerful reason that minorities and the poor don&#8217;t have <strong>more<\/strong> choices.  Nearly every business is subject to regulatory costs that are a huge source of the overall fixed costs that Waldfogel properly laments.  How much of our uninsured are that way because well-intentioned minimal coverage regulations make health insurance <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dukenews.duke.edu\/2004\/02\/healthcare_0204.html\">unaffordable<\/a> for so many people?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Wharton professor, Joel Waldfogel, has just published a book called &#8220;Tyranny of the Market,&#8221; a play on Mill&#8217;s notion of the tyranny of the majority. Waldfogel&#8217;s thesis is this: &#8211; Everyone think markets provide what everyone wants in the right amounts &#8211; Everyone thinks that governments are grossly inefficient at providing what people want [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-128","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=128"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hodakvalue.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}